It is more fun to talk with someone who doesn’t use long, difficult words but rather short, easy words like ‘What about lunch?'- Winnie the Pooh
Alacritous Living
The poems, stories, and wonderings of an old-souled youth.
Monday, November 22, 2010
So far untitled poem
One day I shall run to the sea
Where my love will be waiting for me
We’ll dance and laugh in surf and sand
I’ll kiss his cheek and he’ll hold my hand
The sun will shine upon our lovers’ embrace
Its healing fingers will bless our face
He’ll smell of pine and boyhood dreams
I’ll be dressed in foam and girlish schemes
The waves will sing of our eternal devotion
Of this love fulfilled by the broiling ocean
With carefree hearts and serpentine ways
We’ll get lost in love, in our sea foam maze
I’ll bear him three sons and one little girl
And they too will rejoice in the watery swirl
We will grow old on our rocking chair sea
And happy forever, oh so happy we’ll be.
Falling
In honor of Autumn:
October sun filters through
Trees set aflame;
Shivering heat sets the world on fire.
Birds pack their bags -
they’re growing tired
of fighting the northern wind.
Sun shines warm
but the Earth grows cold,
beginning to creak her bare,
wooden bones.
Moon’s eye turns hard with greed
knowing her time has come.
Leaves sing a sad lament
on this bittersweet day;
another brother has fallen,
silently drifting away.
How beautiful Fall is!
Aristotle is an Asshole
Would you take morality advice from this man? |
I hate Aristotle. I loathe him with every fiber of my being; my reaction to him is similar to my reaction with a serial puppy drowner. Not just because I dislike philosophy either. I got along great with Plato and Socrates, but they also played nice. Aristotle, on the other hand, is an asshole.
I don’t agree with some of the conclusions his comes to (such as mentally retarded people are deficient human beings and as such can never be truly happy) and I can’t stand the smugness with which he delivers these conclusions. Aristotle is an elitist that uses pseudonaturalism to support his idea that he is superior due to his love of learning. I’m sorry, but a blue collar worker who finds joy and pride in his physical task is just as happy and worthy of a human being as a socially awkward philosopher who spends all his time hunched over his tablets, instructing future “Greats” on how to slaughter thousands in order to satisfy territorial gluttony.
Now some may disagree with me. They may say that Aristotle was brilliant in furthering both science and philosophy. They may say that many of our most dearly held beliefs on humanity and happiness stemmed from his copious cranium. But to them I reply: I don’t give a damn!
Despite my not giving a flying fart about Aristotle’s contributions to society, I do have a confession to make. While I do think Aristotle is drastically off base with some of his ideas, that’s not why I hate him with an everlasting passion. I hate him because I don’t understand him. He forces me to confront my own ineptitude in some aspects of philosophical literature and I resent him for that. Philosophy is somewhat akin to literature, which is “my thing”, and my not being able to properly interpret him is an affront to my proficiency in doing “my thing”. And for this Aristotle pisses me off and makes me rejoice at his unfair trial and death over 2000 years ago! Ah, ancient vindication! So sweet!
There is a certain truth within my desire to destroy Aristotle’s name for all eternity and possibly wreak havoc within the lives of those that think he has a point. As humans, we tend to vilify the things we don’t understand. This is not a new concept. But it is especially acute when it comes to people we don’t know. I’m sure Aristotle was a really cool guy when you got to know him and I don’t doubt that if we had a chance to talk, we’d come to some sort of peaceful impass about our situations in philosophy. But because I don’t know him, or Hillary Clinton, or Lindsay Lohan, I’m able to see them as horrible, lowlife human beings that lack anything resembling a soul. The fact of the matter is that that is only because they make me question what I believe and they challenge the things that I hold most dear (well, except for Lindsay Lohan). I don’t agree with them, I don’t understand how they can think or do the things that they do, and therefore I am able to nurture my unbridled, unjustifiable hatred of them.
Maybe I’m sensitive to this because my dad is a figure often vilified in the hockey realm. Because people don’t agree with his calls and they’ll never have to confront him face to face, somehow that makes it OK for them to intricately plan his painful death online. Side note: it’s not, so chill the hell out Toronto!
The thing to remember with people like my father, or yes, even Hillary Clinton, is that they have families, they have people that love them and that they love in return - they’re humans with virtues and faults like the rest of us (who knew, eh?).The point is, I realized today that people, even soul-crushing public figures, deserve a fair shot at living the life they believe in, complete with the values they hold dear, no matter how much we may disagree with them. And that just because we disagree, doesn’t give us the right to decapitate their voodoo doll likenesses or to curse their progeny for the next twelve millennia.
So you got lucky this time Aristotle, I’ll back off…but I still think you’re an asshole.
Sparks in a Dark Room
Humanity is a funny thing. It’s always scrambling to find a soul that mirrors, or at least compliments, its own. It wants contact, meaning, purpose, and most importantly, love. This by itself would not be supremely remarkable, since other creatures also desire many of these things. The difference is that they’re honest, and Humanity is not. It’s too afraid of rejection to be honest. It fancies itself too complicated. So it’s created often entertaining, but wholly empty retorts - cynicism, sarcasm, and simple hardheartedness - to keep the pain of loneliness and disappointment at bay.
Humanity wants to be needed and respected, but it’s frightened of being met with the opposite, so it lies for comfort. It says it’s confident and happy being alone, that it doesn’t need the approval of others to know its path. But that’s never quite true is it? It’s always looking for some form of affirmation, whether through family, friends, religion, accolades or strangers. It wants to know that itmatters. But asking for this knowledge would be too simple, too raw, too open and far too terrifying. So it’s left wandering in the dark, needing something to prove, but all the while hoping to find another groping hand that fits its own. When will Humanity learn the ease, the beauty of being genuine? The pleasure of telling someone how much you love/admire/envy/want/need them and seeing that spark of truth blaze through our dark room? When will we learn?
Labels:
Friendship,
Humanity,
Joy,
Loneliness,
Love,
Sadness,
Truth,
Wonderings
A Love Story
The steadfast hope
The passionate kiss
The secret smile
The bittersweet bliss
The broken heart
The shining tear
The racking sob
The burning fear
The wearying road
The aching hole
The rising sun
The uplifted soul
The snapshot memory
The healing pain
The maturative moment
The redemptive rain
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)